I think that the reasoning in Matthews v. State, 85 Tex. Cr. 469, 214 S.W.R. 339, quoted in 42 Corpus Juris, p. 743, applies to this case. I quote from said decision: Where a statute, requiring a license to operate a motor vehicle as a chauffeur, defines the term “chauffeur” as any person whose business or occupation is that of operating a motor vehicle for compensation, wages, or hire, in order to bring a person within the class of chauffeur he must operate the motor vehicle as such for compensation, wages, or hire, and this has direct relation to his employment to run the vehicle itself for I hire and not as incident to the delivery of goods, wares, and merchandise for his employer.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.