For the purposes of s. 17(4.1), a change requiring a variation of a spousal support order must therefore be a change in the condition, means or other circumstances of a party that is of an unforeseen nature: see e.g. Zacharias v. Zacharias, 2015 BCCA 376 (CanLII), 389 D.L.R. (4th) 310, at para. 29. This interpretation makes it clear that the phrase “the condition, means … and other circumstances of each spouse” as it appears in s. 15.2(4) requires consideration of the assets and means the parties are likely to have in the future.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.