How much intrusiveness should a CCAS of Toronto intervene with respect to the risk to the health and safety of a patient?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Jewish Family and Child Service of Greater Toronto v. Y.M.M., 2021 ONCJ 622 (CanLII):
[39] The degree of intrusiveness of the society's intervention and the interim protection ordered by the court should be proportional to the degree of risk. See: CCAS of Toronto v. J.O.1, 2012 ONCJ 269.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the current state of the law society of Upper Canada with respect to mental health issues? (Ontario, Canada)
As an intervener in an appeal, can intervener expand the evidentiary record on appeal? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the impact of drug use on the health and safety of the public? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for respect and respect for the views of the custodial parent? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there any case law where a trial judge preferred the recollection of a patient to that of a doctor as to whether the doctor had told the patient about a risk of continuing incontinence after a proposed surgery? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for respect and respect for the jury's verdict in an appeal? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for disclosing a patient’s health risks? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for respect and respect for the jury's verdict in a personal injury case? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a mental health patient have the capacity to make a decision about medical treatment? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the evidence of the wife raise a reasonable doubt with respect to the symptoms described by the two police officers? (Ontario, Canada)
