Can a respondent waive the requirements of subsection 60.1(3) of the Income Tax Act?

Canada (Federal), Canada

The following excerpt is from Anstead v. Canada, 2005 FCA 315 (CanLII):

The appellant argued that because the respondent asked for documentation that would support the appellant's claim for a deduction, the respondent had waived the requirements of subsection 60.1(3). We do not see that such request amounts to a waiver. In any event, the respondent cannot waive the right to enforce the Income Tax Act (Ludmer v. Canada, 1994 CanLII 3547 (FCA), [1994] FCJ No. 2007).

Other Questions


Can an appellant invoke the fact that income tax was deducted at the source to avoid the penalty imposed under subsection 163(1) of the Income Tax Act? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Does a conviction for bank fraud require proof of either subsection (1) or subsection (2) of the Bank Fraud Act? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the effect of subsection 85B(1) of the Income Tax Code on income that is excluded under section 85B? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Is there a difference between a responding officer responding to a 911 call and the responding officer who appears in response to the 911 call? ("New York", United States of America)
In what circumstances will subsection 252(4) of the Income Tax Code be allowed to exclude income tax payments made in 1994 and 1995? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
When a statute requires knowledge of the jurisdictional element of a claim, when the statute itself states that knowledge is not an essential element, is that knowledge required? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a jury instruction in a civil case requiring a new trial require a retrial? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for determining what constitutes taxable income under the Income Tax Code? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Is there any case law in which the Respondent has been successful in determining the most accurate measure of income? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the impact of an agreement between the respondent and the respondent on the relationship between the parties? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.