It has been established in decisions of this Court that an appellant cannot invoke the fact that income tax was deducted at the source in order to avoid the penalty imposed under subsection 163(1) of the Act. (See Symonds v. Canada, [2011] T.C.J. No. 209). An appellant cannot avoid the imposition of the penalty, unless he shows that the requirements of the due diligence defence have been satisfied.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.