Can an independent contractor be found to have violated section 1090 of the California Civil Code?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Superior Court of Riverside Cnty., E062380 (Cal. App. 2016):
In People v. Christiansen, supra, 216 Cal.App.4th 1181, the appellate court reversed the defendant's convictions of four counts of violating section 1090 on the basis that, as an independent contractor, she was not subject to the proscriptions of the statute. The court found that the term "employee" did not include an individual working as an independent contractor. (People v. Christiansen, supra, at p. 1183.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Can a defendant be found to have committed a single physical act for purposes of section 654 of the California Criminal Code, Section 215 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 422 of the Criminal Code for carjacking? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be convicted of violating section 148(a)(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure if the jury found a completed violation of section 148 prior to the officers' use of excessive force? (California, United States of America)
What are the elements of a violation of section 422 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, section 422(1) of the Criminal Code, and what is the test for that violation? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 1054(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure, section 1054 et. seq. and section 854 of the Criminal Code, allow defense counsel to conduct their investigation and prepare for trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for Section 654 of the California Criminal Code when a defendant is found guilty of a breach of section 654 or section 744 of the Code of Civil Procedure? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the California Civil Code section 1714 of the Civil Code apply to an individual who has been denied a right to claim damages under the Civil Procedure Act? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a defendant to be found guilty of a section 69 violation of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of section 1714 of the Civil Code 2 (b) and (c) of the California Civil Code, and what are the implications of that section? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 186.22 of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure (i.e. section 186. 22) Violate Due Process? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 139 of the California Civil Code, section 139 2 of the S.C. Code of Civil Procedure? (California, United States of America)
