Can a violation of section 666 of the California Penal Code be considered a felony?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Hutchinson, B257484 (Cal. App. 2015):

Effective January 1, 2014, section 666 was amended to add convictions pursuant to subdivisions (d) or (e) of section 368 to those triggering its application. (See Former 666, subd. (b), effective January 1, 2014 through November 4, 2014.) The statute was amended again, effective November 5, 2014, after voters approved Proposition 47 on November 4, 2014. Under the current statute, "a violation of section 666 can be a felony only if (1) the current conviction is for petty theft, (2) the defendant has served a term of imprisonment for certain specified felonies, including robbery, and (3) the defendant is required to register as a sex offender or has a prior conviction for a violent or serious felony offense listed in section 667, subdivision (e)(2)(C)(iv), or for elder abuse in violation [of] section 368, subdivisions (d) or (e)." (People v. Diaz (2015) 238 Cal.App.4th 1323, 1330.) Defendant's counsel represents that defendant successfully petitioned for recall of his sentence on the petty theft conviction pursuant to Proposition 47.

3. This argument is tantamount to a claim-of-right defense, which "provides that a defendant's good faith belief, even if mistakenly held, that he has a right or claim to property he takes from another negates the felonious intent necessary for conviction of theft or robbery." (People v. Tufunga (1999) 21 Cal.4th 935, 938.) Both defendant and the People recognize this in their briefing, but defendant did not request and the trial court did not sua sponte deliver a jury instruction on this defense. We need not and do not consider whether either defense counsel or the trial court erred, however; defendant has forfeited any potential issue by not presenting it for our review. (See People v. Clayburg (2012) 211 Cal.App.4th 86, 93.)

4. As the court of appeal explained in People v. Tardy (2003) 112 Cal.App.4th 783, 787, fn. 2, section 666 technically is not a sentencing "enhancement" because it does not add an additional period of imprisonment to the base term for petty theft. (See Cal. Rules of Court, rule 4.405(3).)

Other Questions


Does section 12022.5, subdivision (a) of the California Penal Code, section 120 22.5(1) of Section 1385(2) apply to a defendant who personally uses a firearm in the commission of a felony or attempted felony? (California, United States of America)
Does section 654 of the California Penal Code allow for an act or omission that is punishable by different sections of the Penal Code to be punished by one or more sections? (California, United States of America)
Is Section 654 of the California Criminal Code violated when a court considers a felony conviction for which the sentence should have been stayed pursuant to section 654 as part of the calculation of a restitution fine? (California, United States of America)
How has section 490.2 of the California Penal Code been interpreted in the context of Section 487 of the Penal Code? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 490.2 and Section 1170.18 of the California Penal Code apply to a defendant who has completed his or her sentence for a felony conviction? (California, United States of America)
Can an individual be separately punished for violations of section 288 of section 654 of the California Penal Code for multiple sex crimes against a single victim? (California, United States of America)
What is the range of restitution orders for a defendant who has been convicted of a felony violation of Section 288 of the California Penal Code? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 1170.15 of the California Criminal Code apply when a defendant is convicted of a felony (the first felony) and also convicted of dissuading or attempting to dissuade a victim of the first felony? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be convicted of violating section 148(a)(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure if the jury found a completed violation of section 148 prior to the officers' use of excessive force? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be convicted of a lesser included crime of the same crime under both sections of the California Penal Code and Section 654 of the Penal Code? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.