Can a victim's statement be considered in a criminal case without cross-examination and confrontation?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Mockel, 226 Cal.App.3d 581, 276 Cal.Rptr. 559 (Cal. App. 1990):

We find no cases on point. However, in People v. Zikorus, supra, 150 Cal.App.3d at pages 333-334, 197 Cal.Rptr. 509, the court noted that although existing law allowed consideration of a victim statement without cross-examination and confrontation, there were important exceptions to the rule. The court noted in footnote 3 that ex parte communications by the prosecutor are prohibited and evidence offered in aggravation or mitigation of a state prison term must comply with section 1204. Thus at least one other court recognizes the distinction we suggest between victim statements and the evidence described in section 1204.

Other Questions


Is it sufficient for the jury to consider the error in finding that the jury considered evidence from which it could have come to a verdict without reliance on reliance on the error? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 186.22, subdivision (b)(1)(1) of the California Criminal Code apply to a person convicted of a criminal street crime committed for the benefit of, at the direction of, or in association with any criminal street gang? (California, United States of America)
For the purposes of section 1202.4, subdivision (f) of the California Criminal Code, how have courts interpreted the meaning of the term "criminal conduct" in the context of a criminal conviction? (California, United States of America)
How should a jury consider other criminal activity at the penalty phase of a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General's contention that a jury should consider how much importance of a statement in a criminal threat case? (California, United States of America)
Can a reduction of a criminal conviction to a criminal charge change the nature of the criminal conviction? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be convicted of both counts of membership of a criminal street gang and a charge of criminal activity under section 654 of the California Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Does section 654 of the California Criminal Code apply to a conviction for criminal threats made to the same victim two hours apart? (California, United States of America)
Is a person who is a member of a criminal gang liable for criminal activity if they are not involved in the criminal activity? (California, United States of America)
Does section 190.3 of the California Criminal Code allow the penalty phase jury to consider the "circumstances" of the crime within the meaning of section 190 of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.