The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Kessack, 983 F.2d 1078 (9th Cir. 1993):
It is certainly true that a rational juror can infer from circumstantial evidence that a defendant knew of a conspiracy. United States v. Baxter, 492 F.2d 150, 158-59 (9th Cir.1973). But in the delicate business of factual inference, one must not confuse
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.