Can a jury's verdict be impeached by inquiry into their mental processes or reasons for dissent?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from The People v. Jimenez, C063761, No. 07F02708 (Cal. App. 2010):

A jury's verdict may not be impeached by inquiry into the "jurors' mental processes or reasons for assent or dissent'"; evidence of how a juror "^"understood the trial court's instructions is not competent."'" (People v. Steele (2002) 27 Cal.4th 1230, 1261; see also Evid. Code, 1150 ["[n]o evidence is admissible... concerning the mental processes by which [a verdict] was determined"].)

Other Questions


Can a jury's verdict be impeached by inquiry into the jurors' mental processes? (California, United States of America)
Does the doctrine of reasonable doubt apply to a defendant's due process right to appeal against a jury verdict that diminished the prosecution's burden to prove beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Is inconsistency in a jury's verdict a valid reason for rejecting a jury verdict? (California, United States of America)
Does a modified jury instruction in a mental health case require a jury to determine whether a mentally disordered offender would be hospitalized or released on parole? (California, United States of America)
In a medical malpractice case, can a jury be found to have found that a jury member acted in a manner that may have improperly influenced the jury's verdict? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for impeaching a jury verdict in a long-delayed jury trial? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances have the courts reversed a jury's verdict in a criminal case where the prosecutor argued to the jury that the burden of proving was reasonable? (California, United States of America)
In a motion to appeal against a jury's finding that there was no substantial evidence to support the jury's verdict, does the appellate court have any power to substitute the findings of the jury? (California, United States of America)
Is there a reasonable likelihood that the jury understood the instruction that a jury would not convict appellant of a charge of sexual assault simply because they concluded beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
If a defendant has been found not guilty by a jury in a civil case, is he entitled to appeal against the verdict of the jury in his case against the jury? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.