In a medical malpractice case, can a jury be found to have found that a jury member acted in a manner that may have improperly influenced the jury's verdict? (California, United States of America)

Is a party required to request that the court enter judgment on a valid jury verdict in order for that party to have the benefit of the verdict? (California, United States of America)

In a motion to appeal against a jury's finding that there was no substantial evidence to support the jury's verdict, does the appellate court have any power to substitute the findings of the jury? (California, United States of America)

Is there a reasonable likelihood that the jury understood the instruction that a jury would not convict appellant of a charge of sexual assault simply because they concluded beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)

When a defendant alleges that the jury has rendered inconsistent verdicts in his sexual assault case, what is the test for reversal of the verdict? (California, United States of America)

In what circumstances have the courts reversed a jury's verdict in a criminal case where the prosecutor argued to the jury that the burden of proving was reasonable? (California, United States of America)

What is the test for evidence that the appellant could reasonably reasonably reasonably expect the appellant to have knowledge of a crime? (California, United States of America)

What is the test for impeaching a jury verdict in a long-delayed jury trial? (California, United States of America)

What is the effect of the court's comment on defendant's testimony that there is a reasonable probability the jury can agree on a verdict? (California, United States of America)

What is the difference between a reasonable and unreasonable plaintiff and a reasonable plaintiff under a "reasonable implied assumption of risk" approach? (California, United States of America)