Can a jury consider whether a defendant had a motive to commit a crime?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Harvey, F052742 (Cal. App. 10/3/2008), F052742 (Cal. App. 2008):

Although the jury was instructed that it could consider whether defendant had a motive, the jury was also told that the People are not required to prove that defendant had a motive to commit any of the charged crimes. "Motive describes the reason a person chooses to commit a crime." (People v. Hillhouse (2002) 27 Cal.4th 469, 504.)

Other Questions


When a defendant admits committing a crime but denies the necessary intent for the charged crime because of mistake or accident, is intent to commit the crime admissible? (California, United States of America)
Can a jury use uncharged crime evidence to determine that defendant was more likely to have committed the charged crimes because he committed the uncharged crimes? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether there were two crimes committed at the same time, one committed with the same intent and objectives, and the other committed with different intentions and objectives? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a finding that a crime committed by appellant was committed with the specific intent to commit a crime against a specific gang member? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing that a defendant has committed a crime committed while an accomplice is also involved in the crime? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant who commits a violent crime against several victims more culpable than a violent offender who commits violent crimes against one person more than one? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a jury to consider whether a defendant fled after committing the crimes? (California, United States of America)
Does section 654 of the California Criminal Code apply to a defendant who has committed a crime before the crime has been committed? (California, United States of America)
Does the concept of unanimity apply to a defendant's motive for committing a crime or the theory underlying the crime? (California, United States of America)
If the limiting instruction is completely effective, what is the test for determining whether a defendant had a motive to commit the crime? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.