California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from David Welch Co. v. Erskine & Tulley, 203 Cal.App.3d 884, 250 Cal.Rptr. 339 (Cal. App. 1988):
A judge may resort to expert testimony to establish the standard of care when that standard is not a matter of common knowledge or where the attorney is practicing in a specialized field. In this case, the court itself was the trier of fact, and defendants' conduct did not constitute violations for which expert testimony was required. "They were violations of professional standards; standards which the trial court was compelled to notice. (Evid.Code, 451, subd. (c).)" ( Day v. Rosenthal, supra, 170 Cal.App.3d at p. 1147, 217 Cal.Rptr. 89.) There was no error.
Page 344
C. Timeliness of Action
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.