Can a finding at a probation revocation hearing specifically find that evidence of a crime allegedly committed by the probationer has not been demonstrated by the requisite quantum of proof?

The question presented is this: If a trial court conducting a probation revocation hearing specifically finds that evidence of a crime allegedly committed by the probationer has not been demonstrated by the requisite quantum of proof, can that finding collaterally estop a subsequent criminal prosecution for the same offense? Our conclusion is that People v. Sims (1982) 32 Cal.3d 468, 186 Cal.Rptr. 77, 651 P.2d 321 compels an affirmative answer.