Can a defendant waive his right to dismissal for forum non conveniens by availing the procedural devices and protections of his home jurisdiction?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Hurtado v. Ford Motor Co., B247469 (Cal. App. 2014):

Under some circumstances a defendant may waive its right to dismissal for forum non conveniens by availing itself of the home jurisdiction's procedural devices and protections. For example, in Martinez v. Ford Motor Co. (2010) 185 Cal.App.4th 9, the defendants, who "knew, or had reason to know, at the time they were served [with the complaint], of the possible suitability of Mexico as a forum more convenient than California for trying the case." (Id. at p. 21.) Yet they propounded "more than 1,400 pages of written discovery" the responses to which "spanned more than 650 pages," then

Page 6

Other Questions


Does a defendant who is read his Miranda rights knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waive their right to remain silent have knowingly waived their rights? (California, United States of America)
What waiver of appeal rights apply to a criminal defendant who knowingly waives any significant right such as constitutional rights? (California, United States of America)
Does the Defendant have any grounds to argue that it was error to deny the Defendant's motion to dismiss the Motion to Dismiss under section 995 of the Penal Code? (California, United States of America)
Does the death penalty law violate equal protection by denying procedural rights to non-capital defendants? (California, United States of America)
Does a capital sentencing scheme violate equal protection by denying procedural safeguards that would otherwise be available to non-capital defendants? (California, United States of America)
Does a request to have tape recording devices turned off automatically support that a defendant waived his Miranda right? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant waives his right to be present at trial by refusing to leave the courtroom, does he have a right to remain in the courtroom? (California, United States of America)
Does the death penalty law violate equal protection by denying procedural rights to non-capital defendants? (California, United States of America)
Is a non-capitalized defendant entitled to the same procedural protections as a capital defendant? (California, United States of America)
Does not offend equal protection principles by failing to provide capital defendants with the same procedural safeguards as non-capital defendants at the penalty phase? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.