Can a defendant introduce evidence of his bad acts to establish his identity in committing a crime?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Consuegra, D069705 (Cal. App. 2017):

7. Evidence Code section 1101, subdivision (b) permits the introduction of evidence of the defendant's bad acts for purposes of establishing the defendant's identity in committing a crime only when the " 'the uncharged misconduct and the charged offense . . . share common features that are sufficiently distinctive so as to support the inference that the same person committed both acts.' " (People v. Leon (2015) 61 Cal.4th 569, 598.)

Other Questions


Can a jury use uncharged crime evidence to determine that defendant was more likely to have committed the charged crimes because he committed the uncharged crimes? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing that a defendant has committed a crime committed while an accomplice is also involved in the crime? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant admits committing a crime but denies the necessary intent for the charged crime, does other-crimes evidence admissible? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant admits committing a crime but denies the necessary intent for the charged crime because of mistake or accident, is intent to commit the crime admissible? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a finding that a crime committed by appellant was committed with the specific intent to commit a crime against a specific gang member? (California, United States of America)
Does the phrase "the identity of the person who committed the crimes" in Section 10(1) of the California Criminal Code apply to directing a verdict "on the sole basis that appellant's membership in a gang established his identity"? (California, United States of America)
Does section 654 of the California Criminal Code apply to a defendant who has committed a crime before the crime has been committed? (California, United States of America)
Is evidence of other crimes or bad acts generally inadmissible when offered to show a defendant had a criminal disposition or propensity to commit the crime charged? (California, United States of America)
Is evidence that a defendant committed a crime other than the charged crime admissible? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant who commits a violent crime against several victims more culpable than a violent offender who commits violent crimes against one person more than one? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.