California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Harris, 192 Cal.App.3d 1197, 238 Cal.Rptr. 31 (Cal. App. 1987):
The mere fact that a sentence is served concurrently does not necessarily mean that it was part of a single course of conduct. Where a defendant has [192 Cal.App.3d 1203] multiple criminal objectives, as here, he can be prosecuted separately for each such incident without violating Penal Code section 654's prohibition against multiple punishment. (People v. Perez (1979) 23 Cal.3d 545, 551, 153 Cal.Rptr. 40, 591 P.2d 63.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.