Can a defendant be impeached with evidence of criminal conduct that has not resulted in a conviction?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Venegas, A133996 (Cal. App. 2013):

A defendant, however, may be impeached with evidence of misdemeanor criminal conduct that has not resulted in a conviction. (People v. Wheeler (1992) 4 Cal.4th 284,

Page 8

Other Questions


What is the test for reversal of a conviction under section 186.22 of the California Criminal Code when a defendant has been convicted of a charge of criminal activity committed for the benefit of a criminal street gang? (California, United States of America)
Does the identity of a defendant's prior criminal convictions preclude the use of those prior convictions as evidence at trial of the same criminal charges? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have to provide a record of criminal convictions and a history of criminal activity with respect to criminal convictions? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a witness has a criminal conviction for a previous criminal conviction that was impeaching the same criminal offence? (California, United States of America)
Does the fact that it is a defendant who seeks to use prior felony convictions to impeach an adverse witness in a criminal case have to allow the evidence to be impeached? (California, United States of America)
When a criminal defendant contends the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction, how does the Court review the evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant has been convicted of a prior criminal offence and therefore must proceed further to determine the conduct underlying the conviction? (California, United States of America)
Can a prior conviction for a criminal offence be used as evidence for impeachment under section 28(f) of the California Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Is a criminal offence punishable by multiple convictions for multiple offences punishable by the same criminal offence against the same defendant concurrent with one criminal offence? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have forfeited the issue of motive under section 1101, subdivision (b) of section 1103 of the Criminal Code for failing to provide evidence that the victim's prior criminal convictions would have bolstered his claim of self-defense? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.