Can a defendant appeal against the finding that a prosecutor made inappropriate statements to the jury?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Sorgenfrie, C053120 (Cal. App. 12/3/2007), C053120 (Cal. App. 2007):

Defendant did not timely object to the prosecutor's statement or request that the jury be admonished to disregard the claimed impropriety. Rather, he raised the issue in his mistrial motion during jury deliberations. Asserting the claim at that point in the proceedings did not allow for a timely curative admonition to the jury. Thus, defendant may not raise the issue on appeal. (People v. McDermott, supra, 28 Cal.4th at p. 1001.)

In any event, there was no misconduct because the prosecutor did not assert facts outside the record. Rather, he was arguing reasonable inferences from the evidence at trial, as he was allowed to do. (People v. Stanley, supra, 39 Cal.4th at p. 951.) There was no prosecutorial misconduct.

Other Questions


Can a defendant bring a claim against a prosecutor for misconduct on appeal against the finding that the prosecutor made inappropriate comments about a change in the defense? (California, United States of America)
In a motion to appeal against a jury's finding that there was no substantial evidence to support the jury's verdict, does the appellate court have any power to substitute the findings of the jury? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a jury find that a prosecutor's impropriety was not an inducing factor in the election of a jury to find a defendant sane? (California, United States of America)
What are the findings of the Court of Appeal on appeal against the conviction and sentence of a defendant for making false statements under Miranda? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant appeal against a finding that the evidence sufficient to support the jury's findings? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant appeal on appeal against the finding that the jury was deadlocked? (California, United States of America)
In a dual jury trial where two defendants have admitted extrajudicial statements against one defendant, what is the procedure in which one of the juries is to be excused? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have to waive his right to a jury to appeal his conviction on appeal of a jury selection error? (California, United States of America)
Does the trial court's instructions to the jury that the jury must conclusively accept the previous jury's finding that defendant's guilt has already been decided? (California, United States of America)
Does a trial court's statement that it does not believe the jury is hopelessly deadlocked give the jury the impression the jury should convict defendant? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.