What are the findings of the Court of Appeal on appeal against the conviction and sentence of a defendant for making false statements under Miranda?

Appellant presents four claims on appeal. He claims that his statements made to law enforcement officers should have been excluded for failure to provide advisements under Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436, 439-440 (Miranda), that the court erred in imposing concurrent sentences on counts 2 and 3 rather than staying the sentences, that the court erred in staying rather than striking prior prison allegations, and the abstract of judgment failed to correctly specify the fines and fees imposed. Upon review, we remand to correct errors to the abstract of judgment, but otherwise affirm.