California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Quadri v. Alkayali, G042758, No. 30-2008-00113872 (Cal. App. 2011):
This misses the point. As plaintiffs point out, that the evidence proving or disproving stock ownership was based on contract does not transform the declaratory relief action into a contract claim. Moreover, "questions relating to the formation of a contract, its validity, its construction and effect, excuses for nonperformance, and termination are proper subjects for declaratory relief. [Citation.]" (Fowler v. Ross (1983) 142 Cal.App.3d 472, 478.) Further, defendants had a separate breach of contract cause of action in their cross-complaint in which they sought damages. And, pursuant to defendants' motion, the declaratory relief claims were heard first, separate from the rest
Page 7
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.