Can a corporation represent itself in court?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Aulisio v. Bancroft, 179 Cal.Rptr.3d 408, 230 Cal.App.4th 1516 (Cal. App. 2014):

corporation cannot represent itself in court, either in propria persona or through an officer or agent who is not an attorney." ( Vann v. Shilleh (1975) 54 Cal.App.3d 192, 199, [126 Cal.Rptr. 401].) The trial court apparently reasoned that because a corporation is a separate legal entity from its shareholders, and must utilize an attorney to conduct litigation ( ibid. ), the same must be true of trusts, even when the settlor of a revocable trust is also the trustee and sole beneficiary.

Other Questions


Can an attorney for a corporation who represents the corporation in their representative capacity, not personally, obtain personal information from an officer? (California, United States of America)
Does the California Superior Court have authority to the effect that any fair, reasonable doubt concerning the existence of a municipal corporation's eminent domain power is resolved by the courts against the corporation? (California, United States of America)
Whether a court's ruling is based on oral testimony or written declarations, when conflicting inferences can reasonably be drawn from the facts, can the appellate court defer to the trial court's factual determinations? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances have courts accepted or rejected statistics that do not support a claim that the population of a community does not represent a representative cross-section of the population? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Does the revival of corporate powers retroactively invalidate procedural steps taken on behalf of the corporation in the prosecution or defense of a lawsuit while the corporation was under suspension? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
Does the denial of access to the courts by the Department of Justice to defend a civil case against a defendant who is not able to pay for a lawyer to represent him in court constitute a prima facie equal protection violation? (California, United States of America)
On a motion to be heard by the Court of Appeal at the Superior Court of California for a change of venue, does the Court have any jurisdiction or authority to hear the motion? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.