Does the revival of corporate powers retroactively invalidate procedural steps taken on behalf of the corporation in the prosecution or defense of a lawsuit while the corporation was under suspension?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Longview Int'l, Inc. v. Stirling, 247 Cal.Rptr.3d 793, 35 Cal.App.5th 985 (Cal. App. 2019):
"[T]he revival of corporate powers retroactively validates any procedural steps taken on behalf of the corporation in the prosecution or defense of a lawsuit while the corporation was under suspension." ( Tabarrejo v. Superior Court (2014) 232 Cal.App.4th 849, 862, 182 Cal.Rptr.3d 30.) Accordingly, so long as recording an abstract of judgment is a "procedural step" in prosecuting a lawsuit, the abstract
[247 Cal.Rptr.3d 796]
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
