Can a conspirator be held liable for a substantive crime committed pursuant to the conspiracy?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Marks, 248 Cal.Rptr. 874, 45 Cal.3d 1335, 756 P.2d 260 (Cal. 1988):

b. A conspirator cannot be held liable for a substantive offense committed pursuant to the conspiracy if the offense was committed before he joined the conspiracy. (People v. Weiss (1958) 50 Cal.2d 535, 564-565, 327 P.2d 527; see generally Perkins, The Act of One Conspirator (1974) 26 Hastings L.J. 337, 344-345.) The trial court, however, did not instruct the jury that it must find defendant joined the conspiracy before the murder. A trial court has a sua sponte duty to instruct on the general principles of law relevant to the issues raised by the evidence. (People v. Wilson (1967) 66 Cal.2d 749, 759, 59 Cal.Rptr. 156, 427 P.2d 820.) There was evidence suggesting that defendant did not join the alleged conspiracy until after the murder.

Other Questions


If a criminal commits a crime in a different county than the one where the crime was committed, would that change the outcome of the criminal trial if the crime occurred in the other county? (California, United States of America)
Does a co-conspirator of a robbery and/or conspiracy to commit a murder in the perpetration of the crime have to be held responsible for the crime? (California, United States of America)
In a conspiracy case, under section 654 of the California Criminal Code, is there separate punishment for conspiracy to commit several crimes and for the underlying crimes? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant admits committing a crime but denies the necessary intent for the charged crime because of mistake or accident, is intent to commit the crime admissible? (California, United States of America)
Is a person who aids or abets a crime liable for the crime if the original crime was committed independently by another person? (California, United States of America)
Can a jury use uncharged crime evidence to determine that defendant was more likely to have committed the charged crimes because he committed the uncharged crimes? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a finding that a crime committed by appellant was committed with the specific intent to commit a crime against a specific gang member? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be found guilty of conspiracy to commit crimes if they withdrew from the conspiracy before any overt act was committed? (California, United States of America)
Can the actual killer be held liable as an accessory on the theory that he encouraged the murder victim to commit the crime after he had committed the crime? (California, United States of America)
Does a new enhancement pursuant to section 667.5, subdivision (b) of the California Criminal Code apply to a defendant where the prior sentence was for a crime committed after the crime was committed? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.