Can a conspiracy to commit a crime be punished separately from the crime itself?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Meyer, A148250 (Cal. App. 2017):

Section 654, subdivision (a) admonishes that an act punishable in different ways by different provisions of law "shall be punished under the provision that provides for the longest potential term of imprisonment, but in no case shall the act . . . be punished under more than one provision." The statute prohibits separate punishment for conspiracy to commit a crime and for the crime itself if the conspiracy contemplated " 'only the act performed in the substantive offense [citations], or when the substantive offenses are the means by which the conspiracy is carried out [citation].' " (People v. Vargas (2001) 91 Cal.App.4th 506, 571.) Thus, section 654 bars separate punishment for a conspiracy

Page 3

Other Questions


In a conspiracy case, under section 654 of the California Criminal Code, is there separate punishment for conspiracy to commit several crimes and for the underlying crimes? (California, United States of America)
Does section 654 of the California Criminal Code require a separate punishment for a crime committed for the purpose of committing the same crime? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a crime committed by the same person as a separate crime is separate and involved separate objectives? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant admits committing a crime but denies the necessary intent for the charged crime because of mistake or accident, is intent to commit the crime admissible? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be found guilty of conspiracy to commit crimes if they withdrew from the conspiracy before any overt act was committed? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 654 of the California Criminal Code require separate punishment for crimes committed against separate victims? (California, United States of America)
Can a jury use uncharged crime evidence to determine that defendant was more likely to have committed the charged crimes because he committed the uncharged crimes? (California, United States of America)
Does a statute retroactively increase the punishment for a crime committed after the crime has been committed violate the ex post facto clause? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a finding that a crime committed by appellant was committed with the specific intent to commit a crime against a specific gang member? (California, United States of America)
Is an assault committed as an attempt to commit a crime separate and distinct from a crime? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.