Is it appropriate to treat an increase in pre-relationship debt as family debt?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from C.R.L. v S.L.L, 2019 BCSC 2103 (CanLII):

I read C.P. v. K.W.A. as authority for the proposition that it may be appropriate, depending on the facts, to treat an increase in a pre-relationship debt as if it were family debt. However, the outcomes in C.P. v. K.W.A. and in Bishop v. Wang were reasonable and fair on the facts in those cases because of the lifestyle or investment decisions made by those parties, and not simply because the debt increased over time.

Other Questions


Whether a debt is a family debt depends on whether there is a discernible nexus between the debt itself and some family purpose or benefit? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a party seeking to change the date on which to value family property or family debt under the Family Law Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a debt incurred by one spouse for use within the family unit appropriate to account for that debt? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of establishing a family debt and that it was either incurred during or to preserve family property? (British Columbia, Canada)
How is the division of family assets determined in the context of family debts? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving that a debt was incurred for a family purpose? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for an equal division of property and family debt? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for unequal division of property or debt when a spouse fails to disclose their assets and debts? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has the Court treated the Family Benefit for the purposes of the Forces Reduction Plan? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the onus of proof for a spouse arguing a debt that is owed to his or her family member? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.