It is well settled that a spouse arguing a debt that is owed to his or her family member bears the onus of proof. The criteria for determining whether money was advanced by family as a gift or as a loan was set out in Locke v. Locke, 2000 BCSC 1300. At ¶20-21 in that case, Wilson J. considered and applied the following factors: 1. whether there were any contemporaneous documents evidencing a loan; 2. whether the manner for repayment is specified; 3. whether there is security held for the loan; 4. whether there are advances to one child and not others, or advances of unequal amounts to various children; 5. whether there has been any demand for payment before the separation of the parties; 6. whether there has been any partial repayment; and 7. whether there was any expectation, or likelihood, of repayment.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.