Are there any cases where a condition in a medical malpractice application has been modified to include a requirement of express knowledge?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Bell, C081960 (Cal. App. 2017):

960-961; see People v. Hall, supra, 2 Cal.5th at p. 497.) Therefore, there is no need to modify the condition to include an express knowledge requirement because scienter is already implied.

Other Questions


Does section 2337 of the Medical Association's Medical Licence Review Guidelines apply to a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for 'applicable' in medical malpractice cases? (California, United States of America)
Can a plaintiff be held liable for failing to acquire knowledge of the facts of a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for requiring expert testimony in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
What is the actual knowledge standard for inference in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
Does a condition prohibiting a defendant from trafficking in controlled substances need to include an express scienter requirement? (California, United States of America)
What are the requirements for service of a notice in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of section 2(2) of the California Medical Terminations Act on medical malpractice cases? (California, United States of America)
Can a medical malpractice claim in an arbitration proceeding be considered "medical malpractice"? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where an evidentiary privilege has been applied in the context of a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.