Is it reasonable for an application not to seek state protection because of the failure to admit evidence at the hearing?
Canada (Federal), Canada
The following excerpt is from Montoya Martinez v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2011 FC 13 (CanLII):
The Applicants argue that there was no proper reason for the RPDs failure to admit this evidence at the time of the hearing. The RPDs actions violated its own procedures and breached the principles of fairness and natural justice. The appropriate response is for the tribunal to start afresh. See Chandler v. Alberta Association of Architects, 1989 CanLII 41 (SCC), [1989] 2 S.C.R. 848. Objectively Reasonable for Applicants Not to Seek State Protection
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is there any case law where a state court admitted evidence in violation of state rules of evidence? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the current state of the law on "reasonable reason" for an alien's failure to attend a hearing? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is there a reasonable excuse, supported by evidence supporting evidence to justify the petitioner's failure to exhaust? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
If an applicant succeeds in his res judicata application, does the application have grounds to stay the application? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the impact of the interpreter at the hearing of an applicant's application for a disability benefits application? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the effect of a federal evidentiary hearing on evidence developed at a state court hearing? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does the fact that a state appellate court has been granted a hearing on an application for habeas corpus relief at the Superior Court of Appeal invalidate the application? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is there any case law where a member of the applicant’s medical report concluded that the medical evidence presented by the applicant was inconsistent with the applicant's testimony on the issue of paralysis? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What are the reasons of a trial judge’s failure to state that they have a reasonable doubt? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Does the state have to show conscience-shocking behavior on the part of the state when it takes into custody an individual who has not been treated for medical reasons? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
