He then referred to the decision of Mr. Justice Groves in Bockhold v. Bockhold, 2010 BCSC 214, and adopted a number of propositions from that case: 1. A spouse’s illness and disability is relevant to spousal support even if there is no causal connection between the disability and the marriage, para. 27. 2. In some cases employment and self-sufficiency are not achievable, para. 26. 3. No “duty” to achieve self-sufficiency exists. Failure to achieve self-sufficiency is one factor among others to consider, para. 47. 4. The authorities generally favour an indefinite order, para. 56. 5. A spouse may never be able to achieve a level of self-sufficiency similar to the marital standard without continuing [support], para. 58. The appellant observes that in proposition 4 the judge did not include the words of Groves J.: “in a lengthy marriage”.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.