Allstate raises two issues. First, did the motion judge err in concluding that the limitation period tolls based on the discoverability principle in the respondent's direct action #M1206518. Second, did the motion judge err in extending the limitation period on the basis that the facts in this case give rise to "special circumstances" within the meaning of Onishenko Estate v. Quinlan, 1971 CanLII 5 (SCC),  S.C.R. 380,  S.C.J. No. 118. Commencement of the limitation period
Get a full legal research memo!
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexsei.com.