The bank also argues that the information which the receiver seeks on this application is not relevant to the issues raised by the pleadings in the sense that advice or knowledge which the bank obtained from other sources is no answer to its allegation that the receiver was retained to give advice and that the bank relied thereon, I disagree. The extent to which the bank was entitled to rely on advice from the receiver concerning the appointment of a receiver of Abacus will be dependent, to some extent at least, upon the bank’s knowledge of the principle enunciated in Lister v. Dunlop.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.