What is the case law in Canada on the subject of subsequent events which aggravate injuries received in a tortiously caused accident?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Ashcroft v. Dhaliwal, 2007 BCSC 533 (CanLII):

Athey v. Leonati is the leading case in Canada on the subject of subsequent events which aggravate injuries received in a tortiously caused accident. The case recognizes that there may be more than one material cause of injuries and holds that if injuries caused by a tortfeasor are found to be a material contributing cause of the exacerbation of those injuries by a subsequent event, then the original tortfeasor may be liable for not only the initial injuries, but also for their subsequent exacerbation.

Other Questions


Does a plaintiff have to prove that the injuries to her back and nose were caused by the injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for establishing cause of cause of injury in a motor vehicle accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for establishing a cause of cause of injury in a motor vehicle accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury action for damages for personal injury, is there any case law where there is little or no objective evidence of continuing injury? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for apportioning liability between tortious and non-tortious causes? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a personal injury claim arising from an accident which occurred on a boat moored at a harbour subject to maritime matters? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a defendant be liable for causing nervous shock and physical injury to a plaintiff by falsely claiming that her husband had been injured in an accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for establishing causation between a motor vehicle accident and a subsequent accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a motor vehicle accident is an accident or an accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
When there is little or no objective evidence of continuing injury in the context of a claim for damages arising from a motor vehicle accident, does the claimant have to prove that there is a continuing injury? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.