What is the test for disclosing a reasonable cause of action in negligence?

Saskatchewan, Canada


The following excerpt is from Brooks v. Canadian Pacific Railway Ltd., 2007 SKQB 247 (CanLII):

I have concluded that the pleadings fail to disclose a reasonable cause of action in relation to the common law causes of action in negligence, in strict liability based on the rule in Rylands v. Fletcher, supra, in assault or for illegal contract. B. STATUTORY REQUIREMENT 2: — Is the Court Satisfied That There Is an Identifiable Class?

Other Questions


What documents are properly to be considered on an application to strike out a statement of claim on the grounds that it discloses no reasonable cause of action? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does the word "cause of action" mean the whole cause of action? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is there a cause of action for defamation where the words “get down in the gutter where you belong” are not actionable? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is a criminal prosecution arising from malicious motive and brought without reasonable cause actionable? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for a prima facie cause of action in a personal injury action? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is dismissing an action for want of prosecution a bar to a subsequent action for the same cause? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the limitation period for an amendment to an action raising a new cause of action? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does the Statement of Claim Disclose a Cause of Action for assault? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can a multi-defendant class action be certified if there is no cause of action against each defendant? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does a common law procedure act, 1854, ch. 125, which enacted that a plaintiff is not entitled to any costs in an action commenced after the action was commenced? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.