A psychologist’s session notes would ordinarily be producible and these are no different, argues the defendant. The defendant also relies on the decision of McCartney J. in Benincasa v. Agostino, [2008] O.J. No. 2943 (S.C.J.), leave to appeal to Div. Ct. granted: [2008] O.J. No. 4172 (S.C.J.) in which he required production of the notes of an inveterate note taker. In my view the decision has no application to this case. Privacy and privilege
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.