What is the definition of a conspiracy?

Saskatchewan, Canada


The following excerpt is from United States of America v. Griffiths, 2004 SKQB 25 (CanLII):

A conspiracy must involve more than one person, even though all the conspirators may not either be identified, or be capable of being convicted. See for example O’Brien, supra; Guimond v. The Queen, 1979 CanLII 204 (SCC), [1979] 1 S.C.R. 960, 44 C.C.C. (2d) 481, 94 D.L.R. (3d) 1. Further, each of the conspirators must have a genuine intention to participate in the agreement. A person cannot be a conspirator if he or she merely pretends to agree. In O’Brien, Rand J. held at p. 670 that . . . a conspiracy requires an actual intention in both parties at the moment of exchanging the words of agreement to participate in the act proposed; mere words purporting agreement without an assenting mind to the act proposed are not sufficient. . . .

Other Questions


What is the law of conspiracy and what is the effect of conspiracy? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the definition of cohabitation of two people as husband and wife? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the definition of “cohabitation” and what is the effect of it? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the definition of “escape” under the principle of Rylands v Fletcher? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is Lord Macnaghten's definition of damages? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the definition of an accident and what is the effect of it? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether there was connivance between the parties in the context of the definition of a party to a marriage contract? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the definition of a class and what are the causes of action? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the definition of commercial information? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the definition of "wages" under The Labour Standards Act, 1969? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.