Are paragraph numbers 76 and 79 struck from the factum?
Alberta, Canada
The following excerpt is from Turkawski v. Boyle, 2007 ABCA 275 (CanLII):
So as a consequence, I am persuaded that in applying the reasoning in Langan v. Watson that paragraph numbers. 76 through 79 of the factum are unconnected to the appeal at this point and consequently should also be struck from the factum.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How has the court interpreted an offer to maintain a water system and provide water to a number of residents? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a statement of claim be struck where there is evidence of correspondence and negotiations between the parties? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a pleading deficient result in an action being struck? (Alberta, Canada)
Does reintroduction of the photo exception for religious reasons result in a dramatic increase in the number of applications for a Condition Code G licence? (Alberta, Canada)
What are a number of cases that support the argument that objection to admissibility of evidence is to be made at the time the evidence is tendered? (Alberta, Canada)
Is paragraph 6 sufficient to support an order for service ex juris? (Alberta, Canada)
When will a statement of claim be struck out? (Alberta, Canada)
How have the courts dealt with mistake and misrepresentation in factums and orally? (Alberta, Canada)
In what circumstances will the court respect the bargain struck between the parties in the context of the application for interim support? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for having a sufficient number of documents in a personal injury case? (Alberta, Canada)
