What about the applicant’s argument the car was not reasonably durable?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Rogers v. Calder, 2020 BCCRT 203 (CanLII):
21. What about the applicant’s argument the car was not reasonably durable? Private car sales, such as this one, are generally “buyer beware.” This means the buyer is expected to assess the vehicle’s condition before purchasing it (see Rusak v. Henneken [1986] B.C.J. No. 3072 (S.C.) at paragraphs 17-18).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is there an alternative argument that the application of a law of general application to a particular group of Indians in a particular activity is legislation in their Indian-ness? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for the argument that appeal is from a result not a reason but a reason? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law in the history of the Court of Appeal to support the argument that reason is insufficient to support a claim of reason? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law supporting the argument that the cost of housekeeping is a reasonable consideration? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the argument that reasonable counsel ought to have encouraged the respondent to accept an offer of financial support? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for an occupier to prove reasonable steps taken by the occupier were reasonable in all circumstances? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a judge have a duty to hear an application where the adjudicator of the application has been found in error? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is this a variation application pursuant to the reasons for judgment of Mr Justice Hood? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is reasonable conduct in litigation reasonable enough to warrant a reduction in costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can an application to dismiss on an interlocutory application be dismissed? (British Columbia, Canada)
