What is the proper approach under s. 17 to variation of existing orders?
Alberta, Canada
The following excerpt is from Norrish v Norrish, 2015 ABQB 370 (CanLII):
In our view, the proper approach under s. 17 to the variation of existing orders is found in Willick v. Willick, 1994 CanLII 28 (SCC), [1994] 3 S.C.R. 670, and G. (L.) v. B. (G.), 1995 CanLII 65 (SCC), [1995] 3 S.C.R. 370 ….
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is it proper for a solicitor to seek an order under R. 625 of the Rules of Civil Procedure to order that costs of an application be taxed as between solicitor and client and added to the amount to be charged? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the proper basis for a variation order? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a court order all court-ordered sales of a personal injury property be exempt from all court ordered sales? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for variation order in the absence of special circumstance? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for a variation in a custody and access order? (Alberta, Canada)
If a judge makes an order requiring notice to be given, does the judge have the authority to vary or revoke the order? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the proper approach to a summary judgment application based on admissions? (Alberta, Canada)
Can an order appointing an administrator ad litem be substituted because there is an existing executorship? (Alberta, Canada)
Can an incorporated agreement containing provisions allowing variation on a material change in circumstances be incorporated into an order? (Alberta, Canada)
Does remarriage of a divorced spouse entitled to court-ordered support from a former spouse automatically justify or discharge a subsisting order for spousal and child support? (Alberta, Canada)
