Does Ben 102 Enterprises have a bar to partition?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Mowat v. Dudas, 2012 BCSC 454 (CanLII):

Ben 102 Enterprises was followed in Vetter v. Bolivar, 2010 BCSC 652. In that case, at paragraph 18, Josephson J. accepted the proposition that where co-owners have entered into an agreement that is capable of governing their affairs, including how and when one tenant is permitted to dispose of its interest, the agreement is a bar to the presumptive entitlement of partition.

Other Questions


When will a court dismiss a petition for partition and sale under section 6 of the Property Agreement? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of the seizure of a property by the Crown under section 462.34(4) of the Criminal Code of Canada for an alleged criminal enterprise crime offence? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the law regarding partition and sale of property under the Personal Property Protection Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for granting greater access to Information Management Enterprises (IMEs) in a Fast Track Action? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can co-owners of a leasehold estate seek partition under English law? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will a party be allowed to sell their property in lieu of a Petition for Partition? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a party who does not wish to suffer partition or sale? (British Columbia, Canada)
Do co-owners of a property have a prima facie right to partition and sell the property? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any difference between whether a university or a for-profit enterprise is providing food for the university? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the "Koursk" case law in the context of joint enterprise? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.