What is the background to a Master’s decision on medical malpractice?

Manitoba, Canada


The following excerpt is from Grant v. Winnipeg Regional Health Authority et al, 2013 MBQB 194 (CanLII):

The background facts are set out in paragraphs 1 to 7 of the Master’s decision. (See Grant v. Winnipeg Regional Health Authority et al, 2012 MBQB 88) ISSUES

Other Questions


What is the standard of review of a motion judge's decision not to interfere with the decision of the motion judge? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the test for establishing a causal link between a medical practitioner’s failure to inform a patient of any material, special or unusual risks involved with a medical procedure or treatment? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the test for establishing negligence in a medical malpractice action? (Manitoba, Canada)
When will an arbitrator's decision be considered unreasonable? (Manitoba, Canada)
Is a borrower’s decision to obtain a loan that requires payment of a broker fee a voluntary act? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the standard of care of a plaintiff in a medical malpractice case where there are conflicting opinions between two doctors? (Manitoba, Canada)
What material risks are considered in medical malpractice cases? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the standard of care for a plaintiff in a medical malpractice case? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the test for deference to an arbitrator's decision in a personal injury case? (Manitoba, Canada)
Can a litigant's ongoing medical problems excuse some delay in the hearing of the application? (Manitoba, Canada)

There are no other similar questions at this time.