What is the legal test for denying recovery in a personal injury action?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Nielson v. Dawes, 2013 BCSC 375 (CanLII):

If the court concludes that there is no juristic reason to deny recovery, the court must then review possible defences such as a change of position; estoppel; statutory defences; laches and acquiescence; limitation periods; and counter-restitution: Wilson v. Fotsch, 2010 BCCA 226 at para. 11.

Other Questions


If historical driving records are relevant in personal injury actions, would they be relevant in a personal injury action? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury action for damages for personal injury, is there any case law where there is little or no objective evidence of continuing injury? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury action for damages for personal injury, what is the current state of the law on pain? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury action, can a plaintiff recover large amounts of personal injury damages from a vocational consultant? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a party to a personal injury action entitled to production of a party’s personal injury report? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a plaintiff in a personal injury action commence an action against a defendant in the same action against the same defendant? (British Columbia, Canada)
If a person acts within their legal rights, is that person liable even if another person suffers a loss? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the general principles of recovery in a personal injury action? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the legal principles used by a plaintiff in a personal injury action? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have defence counsel in a personal injury action been advised to take walks as part of their rehabilitation from soft tissue injuries? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.