He also argues that the panel could not base its decision on the simple fact of being in the presence of successive term contracts. It also had to take into account the fact that, at the time the contracts expired, the parties were already bound by a new contract, which shows continuity. The applicant did not find it relevant that he had not been on the work premises during the summer (Ferguson v. Wills Transfert Ltd, [2002] C.L.A.D. No. 222, applicant’s memorandum, pages 140 and 141).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.