When is there compelling reason to change the status quo pending trial?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Ruddock v. Williams, 2013 ONCJ 225 (CanLII):
[38] The case of Watts v. Grove, [2000] WDFL 268, and [2000] O.J. No. 909 provides some guidance as to when there might be compelling reasons to change the status quo pending trial. For example, where there is such cogent evidence of child abuse, this may be sufficient.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What are the reasons for decision arising out of a trial about the parties’ motions to change the child support obligations contained in this court’s order dated October 2013? (Ontario, Canada)
Is an assessment report to be used on a motion to change the status quo at trial? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for reasonable grounds for establishing that reasonable grounds are reasonable grounds? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the compelling reasons to change a parenting agreement? (Ontario, Canada)
What is a material change in the definition of a change in terms of material change? (Ontario, Canada)
Is it reasonable for two counsels to stand trial on an undefended trial over two days? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for making an interim order to maintain the financial status quo pending trial? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there any evidence of judicial bias in the trial judge's reasons relied on by ING? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for changing a temporary order without requiring a material change? (Ontario, Canada)
In assessing whether a police officer has reasonable grounds to justify the arrest, what is the test for reasonable grounds? (Ontario, Canada)
