What considerations have been considered in the context of Semelhago, the doctrine of specific performance?
Alberta, Canada
The following excerpt is from Holden v. Tanase, 2002 ABQB 1025 (CanLII):
It would appear to be the considerations mentioned above that prompted Madam Justice Veit in Fossum v. Visual Developments Ltd., [1997] A.J. 1255 to analyze the issue before her as to whether the plaintiff in that case was entitled to specific performance from the point of view of the principles discussed in Semelhago.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have courts considered the doctrine of resulting trusts in the context of a dissolution of a marriage? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a party who dictates different terms for a contract already formed be considered to be refusing to perform the contract as written? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for applying the doctrine of jurisdiction in the context of sexual assault cases? (Alberta, Canada)
Can confidential information be considered property in the context of s.283(1)(d) of the Criminal Code? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the thin skull doctrine and what is the crumbling skull doctrine? (Alberta, Canada)
Does the doctrine of part performance apply to estoppel? (Alberta, Canada)
How has the court considered the specific circumstance of a payor spouse’s obligation to pay child support to a second family? (Alberta, Canada)
How has the Supreme Court of Canada considered “equality before the law” in the context of equal rights legislation? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for specific performance in real estate? (Alberta, Canada)
What are the implications of a court finding that specific performance is not an available remedy? (Alberta, Canada)
