Does an offer made in August 2016 reasonably have been accepted?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Mazur v. Lucas, 2011 BCSC 1685 (CanLII):
Whether the offer made in August should reasonably have been accepted cannot be determined through hindsight, or by reference to the judgment ultimately pronounced (Hartshorne v. Hartshorne, 2011 BCCA 29).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for whether an offer was an offer that ought reasonably to have been accepted? (British Columbia, Canada)
When is an offer not an offer that ought reasonably have been accepted? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether an offer is reasonably reasonable to have been accepted? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving that a party making an offer to a prospective buyer of a dog is reasonable to expect that the offer ought to have been accepted? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law where a party has been awarded double costs for failing to accept an offer that should have been accepted? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is a reasonable time for acceptance of an offer? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the argument that reasonable counsel ought to have encouraged the respondent to accept an offer of financial support? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for whether an offer to settle was reasonably accepted? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for an award of double costs for failing to accept an offer to settle that should have been accepted? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the reasonableness factor in determining whether a plaintiff would have accepted an offer to settle? (British Columbia, Canada)
