Whether appellant has met its requirement for trial and appellate fees and the reasonable amount of any award?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Schwartz v. City of Rosemead, 155 Cal.App.3d 547, 202 Cal.Rptr. 400 (Cal. App. 1984):
Whether appellant has met its requirement for an award of trial and appellate fees, and the reasonable amount of any award, are questions best decided by the trial court. (See Rumford v. City of Berkeley (1982) 31 Cal.3d 545, 559, 183 Cal.Rptr. 73, 645 P.2d 124.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for evidence that the appellant could reasonably reasonably reasonably expect the appellant to have knowledge of a crime? (California, United States of America)
Whether a court's ruling is based on oral testimony or written declarations, when conflicting inferences can reasonably be drawn from the facts, can the appellate court defer to the trial court's factual determinations? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 1118.1 of the Criminal Code require a reviewing court to "ask itself whether it believes that the evidence at the trial established guilt beyond a reasonable doubt"? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a trial court err in allowing the trial to proceed in appellant's absence and without representation by counsel? (California, United States of America)
Does the fact that appellant was found incompetent after the trial not establish that he was incompetent during the trial, but does not establish he was competent at the time of trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether there is a "certainty" over the amount of damages awarded at trial? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 98.2(c) of the California Labor Code require a trial court to assess costs and reasonable attorney fees against an appellant who is unsuccessful in an appeal? (California, United States of America)
Is an appeal moot when, through no fault of the appellant, an event occurs which makes it impossible for the reviewing court to provide any effective relief to the appellant even when ruling in the appellant's favor? (California, United States of America)
If a trial court orders testing without articulating its reasons on the record, will the appellate court presume an implied finding of probable cause? (California, United States of America)
