Alternatively, even if the issue at hand involves a question of mixed law and fact, such that deference is owed, interference would still be justified on the basis that the trial judge materially misapprehended the evidence on the issues (see Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33,  2 S.C.R. 235).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexsei.com.