Whether a legally recognized privacy interest exists is a question of law subject to de novo review?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from 420 Caregivers, LLC v. City of L.A., B230436 (Cal. App. 2012):

Whether a legally recognized privacy interest exists is a question of law subject to de novo review. (See Hill v. NCAA, supra, 7 Cal.4th at p. 40.) Whether the plaintiff has a reasonable expectation of privacy under the circumstances and whether a defendant's conduct is a sufficiently serious invasion of the right to find a violation are mixed questions of law and fact. (Ibid.) If undisputed material facts show no reasonable expectation of privacy or only an insubstantial impact on privacy interests, these issues may also be decided as questions of law. (Ibid.)

Other Questions


Whether a legally recognized privacy interest exists is a question of law subject to de novo review? (California, United States of America)
Is a trial judge a legal subject to the limitations of legal principles governing the subject of its action? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff's interpretation of a statute presents a question of law subject to de novo appellate review? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of judicial review of a question of fact when the issue is whether a project that would otherwise be found categorically exempt is subject to one of the exceptions? (California, United States of America)
Whether juror misconduct has occurred is a legal question we review independently? (California, United States of America)
What is the legal argument that a temporary detention is necessary to protect the privacy of a person who has been questioned by the police? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the court order an independent review of the record in determining whether a defendant has a right to exercise his privacy? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review when questioning whether a defendant received effective representation? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a defense counsel object to a prosecutor's argument that a witness who withdrew from questioning because she was not engaging with the questioning, is entitled to continue questioning? (California, United States of America)
How is compounded interest taken into account when determining whether a transaction violates the maximum allowable interest rate? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.