Whether a jury verdict is or is not perverse or unreasonable is a matter for an appellate court, not an issue to be dealt with by the trial judge: Lang v. McKenna, [2000] O.J. No. 2983, at para. 24. I have already concluded that the jury’s assessments of damages were not perverse. There was a significant punitive element in the trial judge’s reduction of costs, and that punitive element was not warranted.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.